CARU Reviews ‘Collect It’ Feature in Boy’s Life Magazine; Determines Recommendation to Collect ‘Captain America’ Toys is Editorial, Not Advertising
CARU Reviews ‘Collect It’ Feature in Boy’s Life Magazine; Determines Recommendation to Collect ‘Captain America’ Toys is Editorial, Not Advertising
New York, NY – July 18, 2016 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has determined “Boy’s Life” Magazine did not blur the line between editorial and advertising content when it featured “Captain America: Civil War” action figures, made by Hasbro, in its “Collect It” section.
CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
CARU monitors advertising directed to children and online services for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on Online Privacy Protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
“Collect It” is a recurring feature where readers tell the magazine what they like to collect. The June 2016 issue of Boys’ Life presented a recommendation by magazine staff to purchase “Captain America: Civil War” action figures. Included in the content was a link to Hasbro’s Marvel product page
Upon initial review, CARU questioned whether the content was editorial and represented the independent recommendation of the magazine, or whether it was advertising.
In response to CARU’s inquiry, Boys’ Life said that “Collect It” is not an advertisement, but editorial content. Further, Boys’ Life stated that its editors have tested and studied the product and were, indeed, recommending it.
Based on the advertiser’s representation that the feature was not paid advertising, CARU determined that it did not present a concern under CARU’s Guidelines.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...