Cochlear Americas Agrees to Permanently Modify Magazine Advertising Following NAD Inquiry

New York, NY – May 6, 2019 – Cochlear Americas has agreed to permanently modify its “Ask the Expert” magazine advertising to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the pieces are advertising for its cochlear implants.  The challenge arose from NAD’s routine monitoring program.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD initiated an inquiry into a Cochlear advertisement for cochlear implants that appeared in the October 2018 issue of the AARP Bulletin.  The Cochlear advertisement was headed “Ask the Expert” and shared a page with an AARP financial advice column entitled “Your Money.”  The author, identified as a “cochlear implant surgeon,” explained how cochlear implants work and the benefits of cochlear implants.  The ad displayed Cochlear America’s logo and a Cochlear specific web link at the bottom.

The advertisement did not indicate it was advertising, to distinguish it from the surrounding editorial content.  NAD noted that, regardless of the medium, advertising must identify itself as such. An advertiser has the obligation to present its advertising claims in a format that consumers will clearly and unambiguously understand to be advertising.

Relying on Cochlear’s representation that all future “Ask the Expert” print advertisements will have an “ADVERTISEMENT” banner when sent to the publisher, NAD did not review the advertising on its merits.  The voluntarily modified advertising will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended its modification and the advertiser agreed to comply.

Cochlear Americas, after reviewing the decision, said in its advertiser’s statement that it appreciates NAD bringing the matter to its attention and that it would comply with NAD’s recommendations.

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary