Cochlear Americas Agrees to Permanently Modify Magazine Advertising Following NAD Inquiry

New York, NY – May 6, 2019 – Cochlear Americas has agreed to permanently modify its “Ask the Expert” magazine advertising to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the pieces are advertising for its cochlear implants.  The challenge arose from NAD’s routine monitoring program.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD initiated an inquiry into a Cochlear advertisement for cochlear implants that appeared in the October 2018 issue of the AARP Bulletin.  The Cochlear advertisement was headed “Ask the Expert” and shared a page with an AARP financial advice column entitled “Your Money.”  The author, identified as a “cochlear implant surgeon,” explained how cochlear implants work and the benefits of cochlear implants.  The ad displayed Cochlear America’s logo and a Cochlear specific web link at the bottom.

The advertisement did not indicate it was advertising, to distinguish it from the surrounding editorial content.  NAD noted that, regardless of the medium, advertising must identify itself as such. An advertiser has the obligation to present its advertising claims in a format that consumers will clearly and unambiguously understand to be advertising.

Relying on Cochlear’s representation that all future “Ask the Expert” print advertisements will have an “ADVERTISEMENT” banner when sent to the publisher, NAD did not review the advertising on its merits.  The voluntarily modified advertising will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended its modification and the advertiser agreed to comply.

Cochlear Americas, after reviewing the decision, said in its advertiser’s statement that it appreciates NAD bringing the matter to its attention and that it would comply with NAD’s recommendations.

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Realtor.com “#1 Site Real Estate Professionals Trust” Claim Supported

New York, NY – November 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor CoStar Group, the National Advertising Division determined that Move provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Realtor.com is the “#1 site real estate professionals trust.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Verizon Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Satellite-Supported Texting Services

New York, NY – November 7, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by T-Mobile, the National Advertising Division recommended that Verizon either discontinue certain claims about satellite-supported texting services in remote locations or modify them to disclose the necessary conditions for Verizon customers...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge, PetIQ Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for NextStar Flea & Tick Topical

New York, NY – November 6, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge, PetIQ discontinued certain claims for its NextStar Flea & Tick topical flea prevention and treatment product, which appeared on PetIQ’s website, social media, and third-party websites.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Safety Claims for Drunk Elephant Skincare Products Supported; Recommends Modification of Influencer Posts

New York, NY – November 4, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined certain Drunk Elephant social media claims regarding skincare products being “safe for kids and tweens to use” were supported, but determined that two TikTok video influencer disclosures for Drunk Elephant's B-Goldi...

Read the Decision Summary