Crayola Participates In CARU Forum
New York, NY – Feb. 26, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Crayola, LLC., a Hallmark Company, modify the disclosure in television advertising for Crayola’s “Color Explosion Glow Board” to assure children understand batteries are not included with the toy.
Advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children. The advertising at issue aired, among other times, at 7 a.m. on the Cartoon Network during the cartoon program “Ben 10.” CARU noted in its decision that between 51 percent and 56 percent of the audience for that time period was aged 2-11 years old.
The advertiser noted at the outset that it did not intend to direct the advertisement primarily to children under 12 and indicated that the majority of ad space purchased by Crayola for this commercial was during adult programming.
CARU, however, determined that the advertising fell within its purview, given the time of day, cartoon content, and audience demographics of the program in which the advertising aired, as well as the child-directed content of programs that aired immediately before and after “Ben 10.”
CARU then examined the advertising to determine whether the disclosure regarding batteries was adequate for a child audience. The advertising at issue includes a brief, written disclosure that states “batteries not included.”
CARU noted, however, that the toy is recommended for young children, many of whom may not be able to read or who may not understand the small print disclosure that appeared briefly at the bottom of the screen at the end of the advertisement.
Crayola, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company would take CARU’s findings into account in future advertising.
“While the advertiser does accept the decision in this case for purposes of the subject advertisement, the advertiser respectfully disagrees that an advertisement placed principally in adult media to be viewed by parents becomes advertising subject to the CARU disclosure guidelines where a small portion of placements are on children programs, though intended to be viewed by the parent demographic then watching,” the company said.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends NuOrganic Cosmetics Discontinue Eyelash Serum Claims and Disclose Material Connections to Influencers
New York, NY – January 14, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended NuOrganic Cosmetics discontinue influencer videos containing unsupported claims for its eyelash serum, including “naturally grown long lashes,” and ensure material connections to affiliates are clearly and conspicuously...
National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...