ERSP Recommends PartnerWithPaul.com, LLC Modify Certain Claims for Affiliate-Marketing Program; Company Agrees to Do So
New York, NY – April 15, 2014 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has recommended that PartnerWithPaul.com, LLC modify or discontinue certain claims for the company’s Partner With Paul affiliate marketing program.
ERSP is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. The marketer’s advertising came to the attention of ERSP through ERSP’s ongoing monitoring program.
ERSP reviewed online advertising claims for the affiliate marketing, wealth-creation product, including:
- “Making money online can be easier than you think when you know how …”
- “I work from home and pocket more money in a month than most people make all year”
- “More importantly, I’ll PROVE that making a million dollars online is possible with the program I am about to show you.”
- “I’m looking for a relatively small group of people who want to make lots of money online, and the whole purpose of this website is really just to help me find these people.”
- “$5200 in first month” [Tanya D.]
Partner with Paul is an affiliate marketing program that purports to describe a marketing program to become a reseller for a multi-level-marketing program. The advertising consists of the marketer’s website (www.partnerwithpaul.com), which describes how to make money online and invites customers to create an account with Partner With Paul in order to receive a special report titled “The Only ‘Secret’ to Making Money Online.”
ERSP disagreed that the website describes a marketing program to become a reseller for a multi-level marketing program. Indeed, nowhere on the homepage of the website does the marketer describe that customers will become MLM resellers. This is material information that must be prominently and conspicuously disclosed to consumers.
ERSP remained concerned with representations regarding the implication that product users will be able to achieve the success communicated in the advertising easily, with little or no skill, and without a lot of free time. ERSP determined that one message reasonably communicated in the advertising was that consumers can earn money quickly and easily, despite the removal of the word “easy.” ERSP therefore recommended the marketer discontinue such performance claims.
ERSP also noted that the marketer did not provide any evidence regarding the amount of money that purchasers of Partner With Paul have earned using the product. ERSP acknowledged the marketer’s pledge to remove the average earnings grid and testimonial representations. ERSP additionally noted the marketer’s attempt to qualify the claims made on the homepage. However, ERSP remained concerned that the language was neither “clear and conspicuous,” nor was it located in close proximity to the claims. ERSP additionally noted that, as of today, the claim “My best friend was really mad at me…sitting in my home office, deeply in debt, he begged me to show him how I am averaging $136,808 a month online” has not been removed, despite the marketer’s pledge in the alternative. Therefore, ERSP recommended that Partner With Paul discontinue any and all earnings claims until it can support such income statements with reliable consumer data.
Finally, ERSP recognized the marketer’s commitment to removing testimonials that reference earnings, profits, and results.
The company, in its marketer’s statement, said that it would follow ERSP’s suggestions and that it “…is in process of substantially revising our advertising and continue to improve our consumer messaging to be as truthful, accurate, clear and conspicuous as possible.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...