ERSP Refers Advertising from Venus America to FTC for Review
Marketer Fails to Provide Sufficient Evidence for Claims
New York, NY – May 17, 2012 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) will refer direct-response advertising from Venus America Corp., maker of Venus Mother of Pearl Powder Cream, to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), following the marketer’s failure to provide sufficient evidence to support its performance claims.
ERSP is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. The marketer’s advertising came to ERSP’s attention through an anonymous competitive complaint.
Claims at issue in the initial inquiry included:
“Reducing blemishes, scars, wrinkles, stretch marks, acne, pimples, blackheads, crow’s feet, expression lines, irritation after shaving.”
- “The only one that has maintained itself within the market with results; tested and proven.”
- “A 100% natural formula with all the regenerative power of its principle ingredient – mother of pearl powder, extracted from the bottom of the sea and enriched with vitamins to make your skin look smoother, hydrated and healthy.”
- “Venus Mother of Pearl Powder Cream from Veracruz Mexico possesses an antimicrobial agent attacking and preventing the growth of bacteria on the skin. Being a natural product it causes no harmful side effects.”
- “It reduces the wrinkles in very few weeks.”
Following the marketer’s failure to submit to ERSP any evidence that would demonstrate a reasonable basis for its claims, ERSP recommended that the marketer discontinue the claims at issue. ERSP then forwarded its recommendations to the advertiser and requested a Marketer’s Statement as to whether the company would agree to discontinue the claims.
The marketer did not respond to ERSP’s and after expiration of the five (5) day time period provided by the Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program Policy & Procedures, ERSP referred the matter to the FTC for further review.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...