Following NAD Inquiry, BrainFire Says it Will Discontinue Claims for Cognitive Supplement
New York, NY – Jan. 13, 2016 – BrainFire, maker of a dietary supplement promoted as a product designed to improve “all areas of cognitive growth,” said it will voluntarily and permanently discontinue advertising claims for its BrainFire supplement identified in a National Advertising Division inquiry.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
NAD requested substantiation for a wide range of claims made by BrainFire, including claims that “BrainFire is known as a potent Nootropic which is considered a ‘Smart Supplement.’ Nootropics by definition improve mental functions such as cognition, memory, intelligence, motivation, attention, and concentration by altering the brains supply of neurochemicals.”
In response to NAD’s inquiry, the company said it would voluntarily permanently discontinue the claims at issue.
In reliance on the advertiser’s representation that the claims have permanently discontinued, NAD did not review the claims on their merits. NAD noted that the claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.
BrainFire, in its advertiser statement, said it “accepts NAD’s decision and represents that the advertising at issue has been voluntarily, permanently discontinued.”
Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...