Following NAD Inquiry, BrainFire Says it Will Discontinue Claims for Cognitive Supplement

New York, NY – Jan. 13, 2016 – BrainFire, maker of a dietary supplement promoted as a product designed to improve “all areas of cognitive growth,” said it will voluntarily and permanently discontinue advertising claims for its BrainFire supplement identified in a National Advertising Division inquiry.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD requested substantiation for a wide range of claims made by BrainFire, including claims that “BrainFire is known as a potent Nootropic which is considered a ‘Smart Supplement.’ Nootropics by definition improve mental functions such as cognition, memory, intelligence, motivation, attention, and concentration by altering the brains supply of neurochemicals.”

In response to NAD’s inquiry, the company said it would voluntarily permanently discontinue the claims at issue.

In reliance on the advertiser’s representation that the claims have permanently discontinued, NAD did not review the claims on their merits.  NAD noted that the claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.

BrainFire, in its advertiser statement, said it “accepts NAD’s decision and represents that the advertising at issue has been voluntarily, permanently discontinued.”

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary