Hey, Kids: “Wish Me Puppy” Isn’t Magic! CARU Recommends Jay at Play Modify Broadcast Ad for Hot Holiday Toy; Company Says It Will Do So

New York, NY – Dec. 19, 2018 – While hyperbole and puffery are OK in advertising aimed at adults, children cannot understand the distinction, says the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU). The group has recommended that Jay at Play, the maker of Wish Me Puppy plush toys, modify its television advertising to better convey to children that their wishes will not magically come true if they play with the toy. The company has agreed to do so. CARU director Dona J. Fraser said the organization would let Santa Claus know that Jay at Play is still on the “nice” list.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation that is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

CARU monitors advertising directed to children and online services for compliance with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including guidelines on Online Privacy Protection, as well as with the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).

Wish Me Puppy is a plush toy with a bow that lights up when its nose is touched.

In reviewing the television commercial, CARU had to determine whether the advertisement created unreasonable expectations about product performance for the child audience.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, Jay at Play stated that that the use of hyperbole, fantasy, and puffery are permitted in advertising directed to children.  CARU disagreed and noted that it has long held that while most adults may recognize an unrealistic promise or assertion, children may not always understand the difference between truth and hyperbole and there cannot understand advertising techniques such as puffery.

CARU also determined that while it recognizes that fantasy and imagination are an important part of children’s play, that advertisements that feature these elements should not create unattainable performance expectations.

In its advertiser’s statement, the company said it “While Jay at Play disagrees with CARU’s decision, Jay at Play modified the commercial to meet CARU’s recommendations.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary