J&J, Pfizer Participate in NAD Forum
New York, NY – January 12, 2006 – The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products Inc., has eCortizone-10 1% hydrocortisone cream, a competing product.
Pfizer challenged the following claims:
- “One application of Cortaid relieves itch for a full 12 hours and no other over the counter (OTC) hydrocortisone cream can relieve itch for 12 hours.”
- “Cortaid is the longest lasting hydrocortisone cream available without a prescription.”
- “The Cortaid product includes a major scientific advancement that makes it generally superior to all other OTC hydrocortisone creams.”
In addition to the print claims, the broadcast commercial entitled, “Woman in Lab Talks about the Challenge,” depicts a woman in a white laboratory coat working along with other scientists on high-tech equipment. The woman explains that the Cortaid product was developed by J&J scientists who created an “invisible barrier” which acts to keep the hydrocortisone cream “locked in for 12 hours.” The commercial also states that “ordinary hydrocortisone creams don’t last.”
The challenger argued that J&J’s claims of superiority and 12 hour relief were supported only by an indirect laboratory test purporting to demonstrate that clinically significant amounts of its product remain on the skin for 12 hours after the application.
The advertiser submitted evidence that included the results of a controlled, randomized, investigator blinded, head-to-head study which tested more 70% of the market of over-the- counter 1% hydrocortisone creams. The statistically significant results of the test indicated that Cortaid Advanced had more hydrocortisone activity at 8 and 16 hours versus the competitive products.
In its decision, NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, noted that it has often held that “the best evidence for claims of superiority (such as those of the advertiser’s in the present inquiry) is head-to-head testing.”
After carefully reviewing all of the evidence in the record, NAD concluded that the advertiser established a reasonable basis for its claims that Cortaid Advanced is the “longest lasting hydrocortisone cream you can get without a prescription” and the claim that Cortaid Advanced provides twelve hours of anti-itch protection. NAD further concluded that the challenger did not demonstrate that the advertiser’s evidence was materially flawed or produce better data demonstrating different results.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...
National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand
New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.