CARU Recommends McDonald’s Modify Advertising to Focus on Product, Not Premium

New York, NY – May 14,  2015 –The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) has recommended that McDonald’s take care to assure in future advertising directed to children that commercials focus on the advertised food product and not on the premium.

A 30-second television commercial for McDonald’s Happy Meal that included “Teenie Beanie Baby Boo” toys as a premium came to CARU’s the attention through its routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

The commercial opened with two animated characters shaped like Happy Meal boxes playfully engaging with a tube of yogurt. The scene then cut to a child walking toward a Happy Meal box. “I am so excited to find out what’s in here,” the child said.  The meal itself – a tube of yogurt, Chicken McNuggets and French fries – was beside the box. The commercial then showed a second child pulling a toy from a Happy Meal box. In the foreground was a partial out-of-focus image of a yogurt tube.

The camera then cut to two other children beside a Happy Meal box; one held a tube of yogurt and there were juice boxes and French fries on the table. The camera moved in for a close-up of the toy, as one of the children pulled her toy from the box and then focused on the toy.

The next screen showed all the available Teenie Beanie Boo toys, followed by a shot of the animated Happy Meal boxes. The commercial ended with an island shot of a Happy Meal including chicken McNuggets, a large container of French fries, a juice box and a tube of yogurt.

In this case, the advertiser argued that the commercial more prominently features the Happy Meal food/beverage than the toy, because the primary focus and the most engaging aspect of the spot was an animated segment featuring an animated character interacting in a fun way with yogurt.  It maintained that the food was prominently displayed throughout the commercial and was displayed on screen almost twice as long as the toy. Finally, the advertiser also contended that the food is prominently and exclusively (without the toy) featured in the prime real estate at the beginning and end of the spot.

Following its review of the advertising at issue, CARU determined that the commercial’s primary focus was on the premium and that children would have difficulty distinguishing between the product and the premium.

McDonald’s, in its advertiser’s statement, said the “The ad at issue is no longer running. Although we believe that the ad primarily focuses the child’s attention on the product, McDonald’s respects the self-regulatory process and will take CARU’s comments into consideration when producing future ads.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary