NAD Finds P&G Took Necessary Action in Discontinuing Claims Challenged by Libman

New York, NY – Jan. 16, 2013 –The Procter and Gamble Company said it has permanently discontinued advertising claims and product demonstrations that were challenged before the National Advertising Division by The Libman Company, a competing manufacturer of household cleaning products.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD had requested substantiation from P&G for express advertising claims that included:

  •  “Cleans better in half the time.*” (*”than a mop and bucket”)
  •  “Swiffer WetJet Starter Kit. CLEANS BETTER THAN A MOP!”
  •  “Swiffer WetJet. Cleans better than a mop and bucket.”
  •  “Swiffer Sweeper. Cleans better than both a broom and mop.”
  •  Side-by-side demonstrations of a Swiffer WetJet and a mop.

NAD also requested the advertiser’s support for the implied claim that Swiffer cleans better than mops and brooms in all cleaning situations.

In response to NAD’s inquiry, the advertiser asserted that while it believes its claims are fully supported by its testing, the challenged advertising has run its course and all of the challenged claims and product demonstrations have been or are in the process of being permanently discontinued.

NAD, in its decision, said it appreciated the advertiser’s agreement to permanently discontinue the challenged claims and product demonstrations, an action NAD deemed necessary and proper under the circumstances. “Given the strong competitive nature of some of the claims and visuals, NAD recommended the advertiser take immediate steps to do so,” the decision states.

P&G, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “strongly supports the self-regulatory process and will take into account NAD’s recommendation.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand

New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary