NAD Finds Talking Rain Can Support Certain Claims, Recommends Company Discontinue Certain Claims for ‘Sparkling Ice’ Products Following Nestle Challenge

New York, NY – July 17, 2014 – The National Advertising Division has determined that Talking Rain Beverage Company did not mislead consumers by referring to its “Sparkling ICE” drinks as “naturally flavored sparking mountain spring water.” However, NAD recommended that, particularly where the consumer cannot examine the product, the company discontinue claims that might imply it contains nothing but water.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Nestle challenged the claim “Naturally flavored sparkling mountain spring water” made by Talking Rain in television, website, print advertising and packaging were challenged by Nestle Waters North America.

NAD also examined whether the advertising at issue implied that Sparkling ICE is the virtual equivalent to water or healthier than other carbonated beverages.

Nestle argued that Sparkling ICE is mislabeled as “a naturally flavored sparkling mountain spring water” in violation of the Food and Drug Administration’s bottled water regulations. According to the challenger, the beverage does not meet the FDA’s standards of identity for either “spring water” or “sparkling water.” Furthermore, it argued that the product fails to bear an appropriate common or usual name as required by FDA regulations.

While NAD seeks to harmonize its decisions with the relevant regulatory guidance, NAD’s fundamental task is to assess the truth and accuracy of advertising claims as they are reasonably understood by consumers. NAD considered how the advertiser’s “spring water” claim would be reasonably understood in the context of the packaging on which it appears.

NAD determined that the Sparkling ICE label as a whole makes clear to consumers that the liquid inside the bottle is more than just water.

NAD noted in its decision that the products are packaged in a bottle with a transparent label through which consumers can clearly see the bright color liquids. The product name, “Sparkling ICE,” appears prominently at the top, center of the label. The product label calls out the presence of flavoring and additional non-water ingredients in at least five distinct ways:

  •  The color of the liquid itself 
  •  The depiction of a piece of fruit (indicating the flavor of the beverage) inside of an ice cube, The flavor name of the beverage – “Black Raspberry,” “Orange Mango,” etc. – which appears directly beneath the product name
  •  The statement “Naturally flavored sparkling mountain spring water,” which indicates the presence of flavoring
  •  The ingredient list on the label

Following its review of the evidence in the record, NAD concluded that Talking Rain’s description of its Sparkling ICE product as “Naturally Flavored Sparkling Mountain Spring Water” was not likely to mislead consumers. NAD also concluded that the product name and advertiser’s addition of vitamins and antioxidants to Sparkling ICE are not misleading. NAD further determined that the Sparkling ICE label did not give rise to an implied claim that the product is “virtually equivalent” to water or that it is “more healthful” than water.”

However, NAD was troubled by the claims, “THE ADVENTUROUS SIDE OF WATER,” “THE VIBRANT SIDE OF WATER,” “THE BOLD SIDE OF WATER,” etc., which appear on the product website and social media, as well as on billboards and other outdoor advertisements. Unlike a consumer holding a bottle of Sparkling ICE in his or her hand, NAD determined that a consumer viewing such advertising claims could reasonably take away the message that the product is indeed water. NAD recommended the advertiser discontinue those claims.

Talking Rain, in its advertiser’s statement, said that although it “disagrees with NAD’s recommendation that it discontinue the taglines,” the company “will take that recommendation into consideration as it develops future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary