NAD/NARB Filing Fees to Increase, Effective Feb. 1, 2016

The National Advertising Division (NAD) competitor challenge process plays a critical role in the success of advertising industry self-regulation by publicly demonstrating the advertising industry’s commitment to high standards of truth, accuracy and substantiation.

The challenge process significantly increases NAD’s ability to detect potentially inaccurate or unsubstantiated advertising claims, provides a more robust and informed record for the decisions that are made, enables the creation of the leading archive of precedent on advertising substantiation, and creates a public record of successful self-regulation that the industry can point to with pride.

Since 2001, the NAD process has assessed filing fees to challengers to help defray the costs of the system. Currently, these fees are set at $10,000 for National Partners of BBB National Programs (BBB NP) and the filing fee for challengers who are not BBB NP National Partners is:

  • $15,000 for challengers with gross annual revenue of less than $1 billion.
  • $25,000 for challengers with gross annual revenue of $1 billion or more.

Effective Feb. 1, 2016:

  • We are raising the fee for BBB NP National Partners to $15,000.
  • The filing fee for non-National Partners with gross annual revenue of less than $1 billion will be $20,000.
  • The filing fee for non-National Partners with gross annual revenue of $1 billion or more will remain at $25,000.
  • The filing fee for all appeals before the National Advertising Review Board, both advertiser and challenger appeals, will increase to $15,000 from $12,000.

Because we want to assure access to NAD for small and medium-sized companies, the NAD/CARU/NARB Policies and Procedures will continue to specifically provide that the filing fee can be waived or reduced on a showing of economic hardship. Consumers, of course, may file challenges free of charge.

These changes are effective for cases filed on or after Feb. 1, 2016.

To learn more about NAD, please visit our website at www.asrcreviews.org.

For more information about BBB NP National Partnership, please contact Casey Callaway at ccallaway@bbbnp.org, or at 703.247.9332.

The NAD competitor challenge process is detailed here.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Problem Pregnancy Center to the MA Attorney General and Social Platforms for Review

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) referred advertising claims made by Problem Pregnancy, a crisis pregnancy center, to the Massachusetts Attorney General and social media platforms after the company failed to respond to NAD's inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Compostability Claims for HoldOn Bags Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that HoldOn Bags has a reasonable basis to claim that its trash bags break down in compost environments, but recommended other claims be discontinued. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge Aroeve Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for HEPA Air Purifiers

New York, NY – May 15, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge brought by competitor Vesync Corporation, Antadi LLC d/b/a Aroeve Direct voluntarily discontinued certain claims for its HEPA air purifiers.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends pawTree Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – May 9, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that pawTree, LLC discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and LinkedIn.  

Read the Decision Summary