NAD Recommends Cystex Modify Advertising to Better Distinguish OTC Pain Reliever from Dietary Supplement

New York, New York – April 6, 2011– The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that DSE Healthcare Solutions, which markets Cystex Urinary Pain Relief Tablets and Cystex Liquid Cranberry Complex with Proantinox, modify its advertising to better distinguish the two products.

 NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, reviewed the advertising claims at issue as part of its ongoing monitoring program and in conjunction with NAD’s initiative with the Council for Responsible Nutrition to expand NAD’s review of dietary-supplement claims.

 NAD requested substantiation for claims that included:

  •  “Cystex Helps Manage UTIs . . .  and Now Promotes Urinary Health!”
  • “Cystex is the trusted urinary health brand that has helped millions of women manage the pain and discomfort of urinary tract infections.”
  • “If you are experiencing signs of a UTI, you can manage it with Cystex Urinary Pain Relief Tablets, the only over-the-counter urinary pain reliever available with a dual-action formula that not only eases the pain and burning caused by a urinary tract infection, but also contains an antibacterial (methenamine) to help the infection from getting worse while you wait for your doctor’s appointment.”
  • “Cystex both manages the pain associated with a UTI and reduced [sic] the progression of the bacteria.”

 NAD noted that it also was concerned that claims for the Cystex OTC drug might be understood as applying to the Cystex liquid cranberry dietary supplement, since both products are featured in the same advertising.

  The advertiser explained that it markets two separate Cystex products for urinary health – Cystex Urinary Pain Relief Tablets, an over-the-counter product, Cystex Liquid Cranberry Complex with Proantinox, a dietary supplement.

Key to NAD’s review was whether visitors to the NAD Cystex Website would interpret the claims made as applicable to both products. Further, NAD questioned whether the performance claims for the dietary supplement were supported by competent and reliable evidence.

 NAD noted that the advertising at issue “essentially includes three performance claims; that Cystex helps to “manage the symptoms” of urinary tract infections, prevent such infections and prevent existing infections from worsening.

 In response to NAD’s concerns, the advertiser explained that the OTC product and the dietary supplement product are, in fact, different products, both designed to facilitate urinary tract health. The advertiser contended that each product possessed its own scientific evidence in support of its claims, and that neither was dependent on the other to function as advertised. Further, the advertiser maintained that there is no specific link between the Cystex OTC drug and the dietary supplement product, other than the fact that they are both sold by the same company, under the Cystex name, and each has an impact on urinary tract health. 

 The advertiser, however, acknowledged NAD’s concerns about this mixed message, and represented that it would modify its Website, and take additional steps to make clear that it is selling two separate products. Further, the advertiser represented that it would modify any claims that suggest that the dietary supplement can manage or treat the symptoms associated with UTIs.

 NAD determined that the advertiser’s evidence could support the claims at issue as those claims are made for the OTC product. However, recommended that the advertiser discontinue its claim that the Cystex dietary supplement “Helps Manage UTIs.”

 The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it would take NAD’s “comments and recommendations in its future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Problem Pregnancy Center to the MA Attorney General and Social Platforms for Review

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) referred advertising claims made by Problem Pregnancy, a crisis pregnancy center, to the Massachusetts Attorney General and social media platforms after the company failed to respond to NAD's inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Compostability Claims for HoldOn Bags Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – May 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that HoldOn Bags has a reasonable basis to claim that its trash bags break down in compost environments, but recommended other claims be discontinued. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge Aroeve Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for HEPA Air Purifiers

New York, NY – May 15, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge brought by competitor Vesync Corporation, Antadi LLC d/b/a Aroeve Direct voluntarily discontinued certain claims for its HEPA air purifiers.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends pawTree Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – May 9, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that pawTree, LLC discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and LinkedIn.  

Read the Decision Summary