NAD Recommends Toys ‘R’ Us Modify or Discontinue Price-Matching Claim on In-Store Banners

New York, NY – Feb. 28, 2013 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Toys “R” Us modify or discontinue the overly broad price-matching claim, “Price Match Guarantee—Spot a lower advertised price? We’ll match it. See a Team Member for details”.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD reviewed the claim – which appeared on in-store banners – following a consumer complaint. The consumer reported that he had attempted to purchase a game at Toy “R” Us for the same lower price offered online by a Toys “R” Us competitor. He asserted that two Toys “R” Us employees informed him Toys “R” Us only matches prices against Best Buy and the Toys “R” Us website, www.toysrus.com.

Upon NAD’s initial inquiry, the advertiser said the consumer had been misinformed. Toys “R” Us does match prices its competitor’s print ads, but does not match online pricing, with the exception of the prices posted at Toysrus.com and online pricing of certain competitors for baby gear.

NAD observed that even consumers who understand that certain limitations and restrictions may apply to a price-matching offer would not expect the Toys “R” Us Price-Matching Program to exclude online pricing for competitive toys.

NAD concluded that the disclosure – “[s]ee a Team Member for details” – only to be told that the price-matching guarantee does not apply to prices found online, directly contradicts the main message conveyed by a toy store banner reading, “Price Match Guarantee – Spot a lower advertised price? We’ll match it.”

NAD acknowledged that in-store banners may have limited space, but determined that the claim at issue was overbroad. NAD recommended the advertiser either discontinue the price-matching claim, or modify the claim to more accurately describe that the price-match guarantee for toys applies to competitors’ print advertisements.

Toys “R” Us, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company appreciated NAD’s “careful consideration of the issues and evidence presented in connection with this Inquiry” and would take NAD’s recommendations into account in “reviewing current and future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary