NAD Refers Advertising for Diaper Rash Product to FTC after Summers Laboratories Declines to Abide by NAD Recommendations

New York, NY – Feb. 1, 2013 – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by Summers Laboratories, Inc., for its Triple Paste Medicated Diaper Rash Ointment to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for further review, after the company declined to abide by NAD recommendations.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and it is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

NAD reached its decision following a challenge from Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., a maker of competing diaper rash ointments. J&J challenged claims that included:

• “Recommended by pediatricians and dermatologists when other treatments fail.”
• “Thousands of pediatricians recommend Triple Past for diaper rash when other treatments fail because it works on contact and immediately relieves raw, irritated skin.”
• “Your baby deserves the very best.”

J&J also challenged certain testimonials posted to the Triple Paste website.

During the course of NAD’s review, the advertiser voluntarily discontinued certain claims, including physicians’ testimonials that appeared at its website, action that NAD noted was necessary and proper.

The advertiser provided survey evidence as support for its “Dr. Recommended” claims. However, NAD found that the survey flawed by the absence of a randomized survey population and the leading nature of the survey questions. The survey was further flawed, NAD noted, because there was now way to verify the authenticity of the responses. Also problematic for NAD was the fact that the third and final question asked was which monetary incentive respondents would prefer to have when recommending Triple paste to their patients – a $1 coupon plus product sample, or a $2 coupon with no sample.

For all of these reasons, NAD determined that the survey provided was insufficiently reliable to substantiate the advertiser’s “Dr. Recommended” claims.

NAD recommended that the advertiser’s claim, “Recommended by pediatricians and dermatologists when other treatments fail” be discontinued on product packaging and elsewhere.

Summers Laboratories, in its advertiser’s statement, asserted that the NAD’s decision was in error and counter to applicable rulings of the FTC. Further, the company asserted that its advertising is in full compliance with such rulings.

As a result, the company said, it will not implement NAD’s recommendations.

Pursuant to NAD’s procedures, the advertising at issue has been referred to the FTC for further review.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary