NAD Refers Ceres Turf, Inc. Advertising Claims to FTC After Advertiser Declines to Participate

For Immediate Release 

New York, NY – June 17, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) has referred advertising claims made by Ceres Turf, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for further review after the company declined to participate in a proceeding before NAD. 

Claims made by Ceres Turf for its MiniQuad turf aeration tines, used for the maintenance of golf course greens,  were challenged by Trigon Turf Sciences, LLC, manufacturer of competing aeration tines. Claims at issue included: 

Express claims: 

  • “First, we have increased the length of the nose which improves the MiniQuad’s longevity as compared to the Ninja.” 

  • “Ninja tines were made of a low carbon alloy steel. So we’ve upgraded to a 4140 steel alloy, which is the best available.” 

  • “The last change is that we shaved off over five dollars from the cost of a Ninja so that each MiniQuad sells for $14.75.” 

 

Implied claim: 

  • Ceres Turf claimed improvements are relative to the current Ninja product for sale in the United States. 

 

Although the advertiser initially agreed to participate in NAD’s inquiry, following a series of emails between NAD and the parties, the advertiser stated that it would no longer participate in the NAD dispute resolution process. Ceres Turf stated that while it respects NAD and its self-regulatory proceedings, it did not believe NAD’s decision would resolve the dispute with Trigon Turf Sciences. 

NAD believes that this dispute could have been settled through its well-established dispute resolution process and is disappointed that the advertiser declined to participate in the self-regulatory forum. In light of the advertiser’s election not to participate in this NAD inquiry, pursuant to its procedures NAD has referred the matter to the FTC for possible enforcement action. 

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand

New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.

Read the Decision Summary