NAD Reviews Claims, Disclosures for P&G Duracell Rechargeable Batteries following Energizer Challenge
New York, NY – Feb. 2, 2015 – The National Advertising Division has determined that Procter & Gamble has taken necessary steps to modify and/or discontinue a “50% longer” advertising claim made on product packaging for the company’s Duracell Rechargeable Batteries.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
Energizer Holdings, Inc., a maker of competing products, contended in its challenge that the claim at issue – “50% Longer Lasting.*” as it appeared on the front of the package –conveyed the unsupported broad superiority message that the batteries lasted a 50 percent longer than all other rechargeable batteries on the market when used in all devices.
Further, Energizer noted, the disclaimer “*per charge vs. AA 1350 mAh within the first 200 cycles”, was located on the back of the package, and in such a manner that consumers were unlikely to notice or read it.
In response to NAD’s inquiry, P&G said that it was in the process of redesigning packaging for Duracell Rechargeable batteries and that it would, in conjunction with that initiative, modify its claim to read “50% longer lasting per charge” and include the disclosure text on the same packaging face as the claim. The company assured NAD that the change would be permanent and that it would not revert to the challenged execution of the claim and disclosure.
NAD noted in its decision that it appreciated the advertiser’s voluntary permanent discontinuance of the claim “50% Longer Lasting.*” and accompanying disclosure in its current form, as well as the company’s undertaking to redesign its product packaging—actions that NAD deemed necessary and proper.
P&G, in its advertiser’s statement, thanked NAD for its time and attention in reviewing this matter. “P&G is pleased that the parties and NAD agree that the claim, as intended, is truthful, and will update the packaging to ensure it reflects the NAD’s recommendations.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission
New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...