Natural Factors Nutritional Products Participates In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – Jan. 29, 2009 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has determined that Natural Factors Nutritional Products, Inc. has provided a reasonable basis for certain advertising claims made for the PGX Daily Ultra Matrix Softgels, SlimStyles Weight Loss Drink Mix and WellBet PGX capsules. The marketer has agreed to discontinue certain other claims.

The marketer’s advertising came to ERSP’s attention pursuant to an anonymous challenge.

ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, is administered by  the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by  the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).

ERSP’s inquiry focused on claims included in online advertising. Claims at issue in the ERSP  inquiry included: Performance claims:

  • “Controls and balances blood sugar levels”
  • “PGX Improves Syndrome X”
  • “Maintained lean muscle mass and did  not affect body water levels”
  • “Metabolic rates were normalized, making it easier to keep the weight off- no rebounding effect.

Comparative claims:

  • “No diet, drug, or other natural product can do  what PGX can do…if PGX was a drug, it would be the most widely-prescribed drug in North America.”
  • “…many very heavy and evenly morbidly obese people report that PGX reduces appetite so successfully that they consider it a natural alternative to stomach stapling!”

Testimonials:

  • “I lost over 30 pounds and dropped 4 pants sizes. I’ve tried everything but nothing else worked. I feel better than I have in years. I have more confidence and my  family has really noticed my  extra energy. I feel like a new person.”[S.B. Surrey]

Following its review of the evidence, ERSP  determined that the totality of the evidence provided a reasonable basis for the claims that that PGX can “control and balance blood sugar,” that PGX supplementation did  help normalize metabolic rates in its users, and that “SlimStyles with PGX increases insulin sensitivity,   normalizes other important appetite hormones and supports healthy cholesterol levels.” The advertiser represented that it had permanently discontinued the “no rebounding effect” claim.

ERSP  further determined that the marketer provided a reasonable basis for the claim

  • “PGX Improves Syndrome X.”

ERSP  noted that the claim “PGX lowers postprandial (after meal) blood glucose by approximately 20% and also lowers insulin secretion by  approximately 40% producing a whole body insulin sensitivity index improvement of nearly 50%-a phenomenal accomplishment that is unequalled by  any drug or natural health product” was directed to a professional audience. With respect to this target audience, ERSP  determined that the marketer accurately communicated the testing results that served as the basis for the claim, but recommended that the claim be modified to clarify that  the results were obtained in a specific study using a PGX prototype, to avoid the implication that these were generally expected results.

ERSP  recommended that the marketer discontinue the claim “maintained lean muscle mass and did  not affect body water levels” or modify the claim to more accurately describe the results of the testing.

ERSP  noted that the marketer has said that it will disclose in all future marketing, whether  the individual making a testimonial has a material connection to the company and whether the testimonials reflect the typical experience of consumers who use the product.

Finally, ERSP  determined that the marketer provided a reasonable basis for the safety claim at issue.

The company,  in its advertiser’s statement said that it “welcomes the opportunity to participate in the ERSP’s self-regulatory program.  Natural Factors will modify its advertising to the extent required by  the decision, and will continue to inform consumers about the health benefits of PGX.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Realtor.com “#1 Site Real Estate Professionals Trust” Claim Supported

New York, NY – November 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor CoStar Group, the National Advertising Division determined that Move provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Realtor.com is the “#1 site real estate professionals trust.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Verizon Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Satellite-Supported Texting Services

New York, NY – November 7, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by T-Mobile, the National Advertising Division recommended that Verizon either discontinue certain claims about satellite-supported texting services in remote locations or modify them to disclose the necessary conditions for Verizon customers...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge, PetIQ Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for NextStar Flea & Tick Topical

New York, NY – November 6, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge, PetIQ discontinued certain claims for its NextStar Flea & Tick topical flea prevention and treatment product, which appeared on PetIQ’s website, social media, and third-party websites.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Safety Claims for Drunk Elephant Skincare Products Supported; Recommends Modification of Influencer Posts

New York, NY – November 4, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined certain Drunk Elephant social media claims regarding skincare products being “safe for kids and tweens to use” were supported, but determined that two TikTok video influencer disclosures for Drunk Elephant's B-Goldi...

Read the Decision Summary