Skechers Discontinues Spot Following CARU Inquiry Into Safety Concerns

New York, NY – Dec. 1, 2016  – Skechers, maker of Skech-Air shoes, said it would discontinue a broadcast spot that raised the concern of the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) over the depiction of activities that might be unsafe for children.

Television advertising  for Skech-Air shoes came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

CARU, an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation, monitors advertising directed to children in all media and across all platforms. CARU is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

The spot featured a boy, clearly late for class, who leaps a concrete bench, cartwheels mid-air alongside an outdoor concrete staircase with a metal bannister and somersaults across a wet floor.

CARU’s guidelines provide that advertisers should not portray children in unsafe situations or in acts harmful to themselves or others. In this case, CARU was concerned that children viewing the advertisement might be prone to imitate the stunts performed in the commercial without regard to risk.

In response to CARU’s inquiry, the advertiser said that the company is “sensitive to CARU’s concerns and Guidelines on safety.  Skechers understands that children are prone to exploration, imitation, and experimentation and may imitate product demonstrations or other activities depicted in advertisements. Although it believes it unlikely that a child will mimic the behavior in the commercial, Skechers  has discontinued the advertising in question and agrees that it will not run it again without modifications that address CARU’s concerns.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary