BDA Industries Takes Part In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – February 1, 2007 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has recommended that BDA Industries, marketer of the Infinity Razor, add a disclosure to performance claims made in product advertising. The company, ERSP noted, has voluntarily discontinued a comparative claim.

The marketer’s advertising was reviewed pursuant to ERSP’s routine monitoring program.

ERSP,  the  electronic  direct-response  industry’s  self-regulatory  forum,  is  administered  by  the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with polic y oversight by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).

ERSP reviewed core claims that include:

  • “Blades so sharp and so strong it’s guaranteed for life.” “Lasts a lifetime.”
  • “[T]he last razor you will ever have to buy.” “Shave kissably smooth shave after shave.” “Incredibly smooth shave, shave after shave.”
  • “Expensive replacement blades cost hundreds of dollars a year, but you only buy the infinity razor once.”

ERSP, in its decision, noted that the marketer represented to ERSP that it had discontinued the broadcast advertising at issue. However, because BDA Industries indicated that it intends to disseminate select performance claims from the original advertisement, ERSP continued with its analysis regarding these claims.

ERSP determined that claims regarding the lifetime guarantee of the Infinity razor blades would be appropriate, as long as the marketer discloses its blade-replacement guarantee clearly and conspicuously in its advertising.

ERSP further determined that the claims  “Shave kissably smooth shave after shave.” and “Incredibly smooth shave, shave after shave” are non-actionable  puffery since they do not communicate a measurable claim that consumers would reasonably rely on in making a purchasing decision.

The marketer informed ERSP that it voluntarily discontinued its claim “Expensive replacement blades cost hundreds of dollars a year, but you only buy the infinity razor once…” and represented that it has no intentions of using the claim in future advertisements.

BDA Industries, in its marketer’s statement, said “The ERSP provides an invaluable service to our industry. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this matter.”

The marketer added that it “…is always our intent to comply with the guidance set forth by ERSP. We are in agreement with the results of your investigation, and have made the changes which we previously outlined.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary