CARU Recommends KEE Action Sports Modify Broadcast Advertising to Better Depict Adult Supervision

New York, NY – June 28, 2013 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that KEE Action Sports modify broadcast advertising for the company’s paintball products, JT Splatmaster pistols, shotguns and accessories.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Advertising for the product came to the attention of CARU through its routine monitoring of advertising directed to children. The commercial aired during children’s programming.

The advertising at issue opens with two teens in the family backyard, playing near their mother, who is gardening. The action shifts to a fantasy sequence in a forest setting and then again to the backyard.

A voiceover states at the close of the commercial: “You can look for JT Splatmaster in the sporting goods section at these fine retailers or at JTSplatMaster.com. Must be 18 or older to purchase. Adult supervision required. Accessories sold separately. Optix goggles must be worn at all times.”

At the bottom of the screen, in small, white print, it states, : “For ages 9 and up. Must be 18 or older to purchase. Adult supervision required. JT SplatMaster and accessories sold separately. Optix Goggles must be worn at all times.”

CARU questioned whether the advertising adequately disclosed and depicted adult supervision.

KEE, in receipt of CARU’s inquiry, argued that the advertising did adequately depict adult supervision. However, the company noted, the ad is no longer running “and we do not anticipate its use in future television campaigns.”

“If our plans change with respect to the use of the advertisement or if we run other television commercials during children’s programming, KEE will continue to endeavor to comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising, including causing our ads to clearly reflect the need for adult supervision,” the company said.

 

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary