CDS/OZoneLite Participates In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – August 15, 2005 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP), the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum supervised by the National Advertising Revie w Council (NARC), announced that CDS/ O•ZONELite , marketers of the O•ZONELite air purifier, provided a reasonable basis for performance and safety claims made in their advertising. ERSP did recommend that the company modify comparisons to high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters. The marketer’s advertising was reviewed pursuant to ERSP’s ongoing monitoring program.

Among the core claims that ERSP requested CDS/ O•ZONELite to substantiate were as follows:
“Test results show the absolute assault on smoke over a 40-minute time period.” “O•ZONELite™ is so energy efficient that it pays for itself, saving the user an average of $50 in energy consumption over the life of the bulb (lasts up to 6,000 hours — 8 times longer than an average light bulb).”
“In addition, the O•ZONELite™ is far more effective, easier to use and more cost effective than the currently popular HEPA filters.”

ERSP determined that the marketer provided a reasonable basis for the performance and safety claims made for the O•ZONELite. ERSP also acknowledged the comparative benefits of O•ZONELite regarding ease of use and cost savings. . However, ERSP determined that the marketer’s competitive testing against HEPA filters did not provide adequate support for comparative superiority claims made regarding the performance of the O?ZONELite air purifier versus HEPA filters, in general.

In response to the decision, , CDS/OZONELite noted that the company “…welcomes the conclusion of ERSP that the results … were accurately presented in the advertising for OZONELite™ and demonstrated the effectiveness of OZONELite™ in reducing smoke, airborne bacteria, airborne fungal spores (mold), various harmful gases and pollen.”

The company also said it would “discontinue superiority claims as against HEPA filters until it conducts comparative testing proving performance superiority.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary