Elixir Industry Participates In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – September 13, 2005 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) announced that Elixir Industry, marketers of the EZorb Calcium Supplement (EZorb) has substantiated general product performance claims and agreed to modify future specific performance, safety, testimonial, and comparative claims. The marketer’s online advertising was reviewed pursuant to ERSP’s ongoing monitoring program.

ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum supervised by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC), asked Elixir Industry to provide substantiation for core claims in the advertising for EZorb, including:

  • “…unprecedented 92% calcium absorption rate is up to 20 times higher than that of any other calcium supplements…”
  • “Helped thousands recover from rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, back pain, hip problems and other joint disorders.”
  • “My blood pressure is also down. I don’t have breathing problems any more.”
  • “No known side effects”

ERSP determined that the evidence in the case record does not support comparative claims made in the EZorb Calcium Supplement advertising. Moreover, although the testing does support isolated performance improvements in calcium deficient disorders, the lack of specific testing on the product as packaged does not support all of the specific performance claims. ERSP did note that the sales data provided by Elix ir Industry provided sufficient support for its claim that EZorb “Helped thousands recover f rom rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, back pain, hip problems and other joint disorders.” ERSP agreed that the addition of disclosure language to the consumer testimonials will assist in clarifying typical results, but also determined that the testimonials must reflect the typical product performance. ERSP also determined that the marketer’s claim that EZorb has “no known side effects” was supported but that it could not substantiate its more specific safety claim regarding stomach disorders and kidney stones.

In response to the ERSP decision, Elixir Industry stated that it “…respectfully disagrees with some of the … conclusions of ERSP, it nevertheless agrees, in the interest of consumer confidence, to take ERSP’s recommendations into consideration and appropriately modify its future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary