ERSP Expands Review of Telemarketing and Live Seminars

New York, NY – April 6, 2015 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) today reported on the last six months of activity, under its program to review telemarketing scripts and calls, as well as recordings of live real estate investing seminars by companies participating in its Review Program.

Since it’s last Activity Report, ERSP has expanded its telemarketing monitoring program with the inclusion of two new participants, National Marketing & Learning and Professional Learning Institute, LLC.

ERSP is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus and funded by the Electronic Retailing Association.

ERSP, founded in 2004, has earned the respect of the direct-response industry through its expeditious, fair and even-handed review of core truth-and-accuracy advertising claims made by electronic retailers.

As part of its self-regulatory undertaking, ERSP evaluates the “primary” or “core” claims made in participants’ advertising materials, scripts, and telemarketing recordings, and presentations, i.e., those representations which are deemed by ERSP to be the most significant and fundamental in the communication of material attributes or characteristics of their coaching or mentoring program. The “primary” or “core” claims in a script, telemarketing call, or a live seminar for a coaching or mentoring program include (but are not limited to) claims relating to the objective benefits of the coaching or mentoring program (especially financial benefits) and the qualifications of coaches or mentors or the nature of the assistance.

As part of its expanded monitoring review of the advertising practices of the lead generation industry, since the inception of the program, ERSP has closed 27 cases regarding the truth and accuracy of core claims communicated in lead generation advertising. In addition, ERSP currently has three lead generation cases pending.

“ERSP is encouraged by the commitments of the participants to self-regulate their advertising practices, and we’re very optimistic that other companies in this industry will follow their example and join us in this self-regulatory initiative,” said Peter Marinello, Director, ERSP.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary