ERSP Refers NVE Pharmaceuticals To FTC

New York, NY – September 4, 2008 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has referred advertising  by  NVE Pharmaceuticals,  marketer of  the Appuloss Herbal  Dietary  Supplement,  to the Federal  Trade  Commission  (FTC),  following  the marketer’s   failure   to  provide   a  substantive   response   to  ESRP’s   request  for substantiation of advertising claims.

The  online  advertising  came  to  the  attention  of   ESRP   pursuant  to  its  ongoing monitoring activities.

ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s  self-regulatory  forum, is  administered by   the  Council  of   Better  Business  Bureaus  (CBBB)  with  policy  oversight  by   the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).

Claims at issue in the initial inquiry included:

  • •           “Helps burn fat on: Bellies, Butts, Hips, and Thighs”
  • •           “Combat diet fatigue”
  • •           “Oxidize fat”
  • •           “Don’t just burn belly fat, get help burning it all with Appulos Diet.”
  • •           “Appuloss immediate release granules help burn fat on bellies, hips, thighs, and butts  while busting energy.”
  • •           “When combined with caffeine these two powerhouse ingredients (Epichasine™ and   EGGG) have been reported to enhance fat oxidation, stimulate thermogenisis, influence body weight and body composition via changes in EE(24-hour energy expenditure)”
  • •           “Appuloss Diet is a unique proprietary complex of the most pivotal thermogenic agents internationally studied.”
  • •           “Appuloss Diet may become the strongest, most effective diet break through to date.”

At the outset of  ERSP’s inquiry, a representative of  the marketer was granted short extension  to allow for submission  of  a substantial  written  response to the claims  at issue. Subsequently, the marketer failed to submit a response.

Following a second attempt by  ERSP  to contact the marketer, and subsequent failure by  the marketer to submit a substantial written response within an additional 10 day period, ERSP  has referred this inquiry to the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to section 2.6(B) of the ERSP  Policy  and Procedures.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary