ERSP Refers Super Prostate Formula To The FTC
New York, NY – September 22, 2004 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (“ERSP”), the ele ctronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, announced that it will refer advertising by Physicians Choice, Inc for its dietary supplement, Super Prostate Formula, to the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). The truth and accuracy of the marketer’s claims came to the attention of ERSP through its routine and on-going monitoring program.
The following statements were representative of the core claims at issue in the 30-minutes Super Prostate
Formula infomercial: all men are destined to have an enlarged prostate; “can reverse the problem of an enlarged prostate”; “Studies have shown that the nutrients found in the Super Prostate Formula may actually reduce the size of the prostate”; “Bioperine – clinically proven to increase nutrient absorption up to 250%”; “…incredible reduction in the number of times a man needs to get up at night.”
Physician’s Choice, Inc decided to not address the product performance claims made in their thirty- minute infomercial. Pursuant to ERSP procedures, the marketer’s actions have compelled the self- regulatory forum to refer this inquiry to the FTC in order to address ERSP’s preliminary concerns with the advertising in the Super Prostate Formula infomercial.
ERSP was launched on August 1, 2004 with policy oversight provided by National Advertising Review Council (“NARC”) to look at the truth and accuracy of claims in direct response marketing. The direct response industry, which includes long form (infomercial) productions, short-form commercials, live home shopping channels, Internet marketing and radio advertising generated estimated revenues of $256 billion in 2003 alone. This self-regulatory forum inquires about the truth and accuracy of claims in both short and long format direct response advertising brought to ERSP’s attention through consumer or competitor challenges and ERSP’s own ongoing monitoring program
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.”
NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.