Iovate Health Sciences Participates In ERSP Forum
New York,NY– August 29, 2007 – The Electronic Retailing Self -Regulation Program (ERSP) has determined that Iovate Health Sciences Inc. (Iovate) has substantiated performance, establishment, and exclusivity claims for the Sleep MD Formula and found the marketer’s voluntary modification of the expert endorsement claim to be adequate. The marketer’s advertising was challenged by WellNx Life Sciences, a competing manufacturer of nutritional supplements.
ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).
ERSP reviewed the following core claims:
- “Helps you fall asleep fast and wake up refreshed” “Promotes healthy sleep patterns and natural biorhythms” “Delivers restful, drug-free sleep when you need it”
- “…clinically proven key ingredient and formulated with the latest in cutting-edge nanoparticulation technology”
- “This groundbreaking process, Nano-Diffuse™, reduces the size of a precise portion of the formula’s primary ingredient to near-micron size, allowing the dissolution process to begin right on your tongue.”
- “Doctor Formulated. Doctor Approved”
ERSP determined that the multiple clinical studies submitted by the marketer provided adequate support for the performance claims which involved the relative speed of sleep onset, the quality of sleep experienced, and the general safety of the product.
ERSP found that three clinical studies conducted using the same dosage level of the primary ingredient contained in the product adequately supported the establishment claim that the ingredient has been “clinically proven” to perform.
ERSP concluded that the exclusivity claims were adequately supported and determined that the marketer’s voluntary modification of its “Doctor Formulated” claim sufficiently alleviated the potential that the claim would be broadly interpreted by consumers as meaning that the product is recommended by independent doctors.
The company, in its marketer statement, said that “Iovate is pleased that ERSP found all of the performance claims for Sleep MD to be substantiated by randomized, double -blind, placeb o- controlled trials.” The marketer continued to say “Iovate appreciates ERSP’s careful attention to this matter and will continue to support ERSP’s efforts to promote truthful and accurate advertising of dietary supplements.”
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.”
NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.