NAD Refers Advertising by MillerCoors to FTC After Company Declines to Participate in a Review of its Advertising Claims
New York, NY – Aug. 13, 2013 – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by MillerCoors, LLC, to the Federal Trade Commission for further review, following the company’s refusal to participate in a review of certain advertising claims.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
Advertising claims made by MillerCoors for its Coors Light Beer can were challenged by Anheuser-Busch, LLC, a competing brewer. The challenged advertising claims appeared on the Coors Light beer can itself, on the product’s packaging, on social media websites, on the Coors Light website, and in at least two television commercials.
Challenged claims included:
- “The World’s Most Refreshing Can.”
- “NEW Double Vented wide Mouth.”
- “2 Stage Cold Activation & Frost Brew Liner.”
- “When the Mountains Turn Blue It’s As Cold as the Rockies.”
- “Smoother, More Refreshing Pour.”
- “Locks in Frost Brewed Taste.”
- “Beer on the inside, Science on the outside.”
Anheuser-Busch also challenged the implied claim that Coors Light Beer cans are technologically superior to other beer cans, and provide a more refreshing beverage experience.
The advertiser respectfully declined to provide a substantive response to the challenge, which it characterized as “frivolous,” defended the claims at issue as either puffery or literally truthful and noted that it expects that all of the “World’s Most Refreshing Can” television and radio spots and related digital campaigns currently running to be permanently discontinued by the end of September.
Given the advertiser’s decision against participation in the self-regulatory process, NAD has referred the advertising at issue to the Federal Trade Commission for review, pursuant to NAD/CARU Procedures.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”