NAD Refers Advertising for MiMedx Wound-Care Products to FDA, FTC for Further Review
New York, NY – May 20, 2014 – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by MiMedx Group, Inc., for its EpiFix and EpiFix Micronized wound-care products to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for further review, after the advertiser declined to participate in NAD’s review of its advertising claims.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
The claims at issue were challenged by Organogenesis, Inc., maker of competing Apligraf and Dermagraft wound-care products.
Organogenesis contended that:
- The advertiser is making claims that EpiFix can “treat,” “heal” or “repair” diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs), which misleadingly imply that the products are approved as “medical devices” by the FDA.
- The advertiser’s comparative claims do not clearly and sufficiently disclose that only the challenger’s products are FDA-approved medical devices that have met FDA’s strict premarketing requirements.
- Making a comparison between the two products with regard to cost effectiveness and waste implies that the products are clinically interchangeable, even though there is no data to establish that the products are, in fact, interchangeable with respect to both safety and efficacy.
MiMedx Group stated that, although it has great respect for the NAD process, it believes that the challenge relates to regulatory issues that properly belong before the FDA — not NAD — and therefore declined to participate.
NAD noted in its decision that the FDA mandate to ensure the safety and efficacy of products differs from NAD’s charge – to ensure that advertising claims convey truth and accurate messages to consumers – including professional consumers.
Given the seriousness of the advertising claims at issue, NAD noted, it is disappointed that the advertiser declined to participate in the self-regulatory forum.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.”
NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim
New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.