NAD Reviews ‘#1” Claim for Gurwitch ‘Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer’

New York, NY – June 19, 2013 – The National Advertising Division has recommended that Gurwitch Products LLC provide a more detailed disclosure in print advertising for the company’s “Laura Mercier Tinted Moisturizer.”

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. As part of its routine monitoring program, NAD requested substantiation the following claim:

• “The #1 selling Tinted Moisturizer.*”

*Based on The NPD Group, Inc. U.S. volume sales in prestige retail YE 2012.

NAD questioned whether the claim implied that the product is the top-selling tinted moisturizer in the United States.
The advertiser argued that the disclosure was clear and conspicuous and featured in a font that contrasted with the background image. Further, the advertiser noted that the disclosure referred to the “prestige retail” category, which it said was commonly understood in the industry as retail stores that offer relatively high price-point items within a product category, as distinguished from “mass retail” or value-oriented department stores.

Following its review, NAD recommended that the disclosure be modified to make clear that the claim is based on NPD sales data from “better” department stores and online retailers.

NAD further determined that the disclosure as it appeared in Internet advertising was clear, conspicuous and in close proximity to the qualifying claim. However, NAD recommended that the disclosure in the print advertisements be modified to be more conspicuous and appear in immediate proximity to the “#1” claim.

Gurwitch, in its advertiser’s statement, said it “disappointed with NAD’s findings regarding the format of the disclosure language in some versions of its print advertising and NAD’s concern regarding possible interpretations of what constitutes a ‘prestige’ retailer, and respectfully disagrees with NAD’s analysis. Nevertheless, as a strong supporter of the self-regulatory process, Gurwitch will take NAD’s recommendations into consideration.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary