NAD Finds Certain Carbohydrate Claims for Olé Mexican Foods Tortillas Supported; Recommends Discontinuation of Other Claims

New York, NY – July 24, 2023 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that Olé Mexican Foods, Inc. provided a reasonable basis for total carbohydrate amounts, some net carbohydrate amounts, and carb-effective calculations advertised on its product packaging and website for its La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortillas. 

However, NAD recommended that Olé discontinue:

  • Any claims that its products have “0 net carbs per serving,” are “keto net zero” and any effective carb count calculations that indicate 0 net carbohydrates per serving for any products that have more than .5 grams of net carbs; and     
  • The “Carb Lean” claim found on the product labeling and website for the La Banderita Carb Counter product and certain Xtreme Wellness products.

 

The claims at issue were challenged by Gruma Corporation. Both Gruma and Olé manufacture and sell “low” or “no” net carbohydrate products.

 

Total Carbohydrate Claims

NAD noted that the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes the variability in natural ingredients in the packaged food industry that leads to variations in nutritional content and makes allowances for the discrepancies that may result. Therefore, the FDA allows for a 20% variance from the amount of total carbohydrates declared on the label. 

NAD determined that while the testing provided by Olé shows that the total carbohydrate amount differs from that advertised on the product packaging, these differences fall within the range FDA deems reasonable. 

Accordingly, NAD found that the total carbohydrate amounts advertised on the product packaging and website for La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortillas are supported because they are within the variation allowed within the industry.

 

Net Carbohydrate Claims

Gruma also challenged Olé’s net carbohydrate claims including the express “net carbs per serving” declaration on the front and back of each tortilla’s packaging and the “effective carb count per tortilla” calculation on the back of each product’s packaging.

Considering the variation in nutritional makeup inherent in ingredients and the fact that the FDA and packaged food industry accept and acknowledge these variations, NAD found that Olé provided a reasonable basis for its net carbohydrate declarations and carb-effective calculations on certain La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortilla packaging. 

Regarding the claims on Olé’s La Banderita Carb Counter Street Taco tortilla packaging that it has “0 net carbs per serving” and is “keto net zero,” NAD determined that consumers would reasonably expect that “0 net carbs” claims mean that the product has less than .5 grams of net carbs. Therefore, NAD recommended that Olé discontinue any claims that its products have “0 net carbs per serving,” are “keto net zero,” and any effective carb count calculations that indicate 0 net carbohydrates per serving for any products that have more than .5 grams of net carbs.

 

Carb Lean Claim

NAD concluded that the term “Carb Lean” in the context of tortilla packaging reasonably conveys the message that the product is either low in total carbohydrates or low in net carbohydrates. In the absence of any explanation about how the carbohydrate numbers in Olé’s testing substantiate these claims, NAD recommended Olé discontinue the “Carb Lean” claim on certain product packaging and on the website. 

In its advertiser statement, Olé stated that it will “discontinue use of ‘carb lean’ claims” despite its disagreement with NAD’s conclusion and that it will “comply with NAD’s recommendation concerning making ‘zero net carb’ claims where it possesses substantiation consistent with FDA’s rounding rules.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archivePer NAD Procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers

New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.

Read the Decision Summary