National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue “Enamel Safe” Claim for Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash

New York, NY – January 24, 2025 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by oral care competitor GuruNanda LLC, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials, Inc. discontinue the claim that its Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash is “Enamel Safe.”

Fast-Track SWIFT is an expedited process designed for single-issue advertising cases brought to the National Advertising Division (NAD). At issue was whether Oral Essentials had a reasonable basis to claim that its Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash is “Enamel Safe.” 

The challenged claim appeared on the Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash label and in other advertising. In some iterations the “enamel safe” claim appears close to a “clinically proven” claim, unconnected to any specific claim in the advertising. Oral Essentials relied on the results of a Scanning Electron Microsopy (SEM) study on the effects of the use of Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash on enamel tooth chips after being treated in the manner instructed on the packaging. 

NAD found that Oral Essentials’ evidence did not support the unqualified safety claim and noted that while the 30-day SEM study has a number of hallmarks of a well-controlled study and did not indicate any negative effect on the enamel samples studied, it was not a good fit for the challenged unqualified “Enamel Safe” claim, which NAD found reasonably conveys a message that daily use of the product will have no negative impact on enamel. 

Therefore, NAD recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue the challenged “Enamel Safe” claim. NAD noted that nothing in its decision precludes Oral Essentials from making other truthful and non-misleading claims regarding the safety of its Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash, including claims relating to the product’s effect on enamel.

In its advertiser statement, Oral Essentials stated that “while strongly disagreeing with NAD’s decision, as a supporter of the advertising industry’s system of voluntary self-regulation, Oral Essentials will follow NAD’s recommendation.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. This press release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue “Enamel Safe” Claim for Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash

New York, NY – January 24, 2025 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue the claim that its Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash is “Enamel Safe.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge Admire Aesthetics Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for Compounded Tirzepatide

New York, NY – January 23, 2025 – In a BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division challenge brought by Eli Lilly, Admire Aesthetics voluntarily discontinued certain advertising claims for its compounded tirzepatide product.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Claims for Brainiac Applesauce and Gummy Vitamins Supported; Recommends Others be Discontinued or Modified

New York, NY – January 22, 2025 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ingenuity Brands provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Brainiac Brain Squeezers Applesauce products and BrainPack Daily Adult Gummy Vitamins, but recommended other claims be discontinued or...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Procter & Gamble Modify or Discontinue Certain #1 Claims for Tide Free & Gentle

New York, NY – January 17, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that P&G modify the claim “From Tide, the #1 brand used by dermatologists” when used in connection with imagery for Tide Free & Gentle and discontinue the related claim “From Tide, the #1 Trusted Detergent Brand for Sensitive...

Read the Decision Summary