Sarpes Beverage Participates In ERSP Forum
New York, NY – June 28, 2010 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has determined that Sarpes Beverages LLC can support general efficacy claims for Dream Water, but recommended the marketer modify certain consumer testimonials.
The marketer’s advertising came to ERSP’s attention through ERSP’s routine monitoring of electronic direct-response advertising.
ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum, is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).
ERSP examined claims in online advertising that included:
- · “The First Water that Helps You Relax and Fall Asleep.”
- · “Wow, I haven’t been able to sleep in years and in just one night the lemon shot worked. I started feeling really relaxed within just a few minutes o taking the shot…” Susan, Washington dc
- · “…and in about 20 minutes I started to get pretty tired. I went to bed and fell fast asleep in no time” Emily, Charlotte, NC
- · “…helped me to fall asleep in like 30 minutes instead of 2 hours.” David, Orlando, FL
- · “The Dream Water worked better than just the melatonin I had been taking and it’s great.” Ken, Houston TX
ERSP determined that the marketer provided a reasonable basis for its core message of product efficacy, as well as its representation that Dream Water is the “First Water that Helps You Relax and Fall Asleep.”
However, ERSP determined that the marketer did not adequately support claims made in consumer testimonials regarding the onset of action (“just a few minutes;” “20 minutes;” “30 minutes”) and recommended the advertiser discontinue such claims.
The company, in its marketer’s statement, said it appreciated ERSP’s review. “We will be vigilant that all media containing any testimonials be thoroughly monitored … ,” the company said.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Finds Realtor.com “#1 Site Real Estate Professionals Trust” Claim Supported
New York, NY – November 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor CoStar Group, the National Advertising Division determined that Move provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Realtor.com is the “#1 site real estate professionals trust.
National Advertising Division Recommends Verizon Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Satellite-Supported Texting Services
New York, NY – November 7, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by T-Mobile, the National Advertising Division recommended that Verizon either discontinue certain claims about satellite-supported texting services in remote locations or modify them to disclose the necessary conditions for Verizon customers...
Following National Advertising Division Challenge, PetIQ Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for NextStar Flea & Tick Topical
New York, NY – November 6, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge, PetIQ discontinued certain claims for its NextStar Flea & Tick topical flea prevention and treatment product, which appeared on PetIQ’s website, social media, and third-party websites.
National Advertising Division Finds Certain Safety Claims for Drunk Elephant Skincare Products Supported; Recommends Modification of Influencer Posts
New York, NY – November 4, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined certain Drunk Elephant social media claims regarding skincare products being “safe for kids and tweens to use” were supported, but determined that two TikTok video influencer disclosures for Drunk Elephant's B-Goldi...