DSSRC Administrative Closure #79

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding three social media posts disseminated by its salesforce members. The subject social media posts came to DSSRC’s attention pursuant to its independent monitoring of advertising in the direct selling marketplace. Specifically, DSSRC expressed concerns that the posts conveyed unsupported product, health and wellness benefits and the message that the Company’s direct selling products can protect against COVID-19. 
 
The first Facebook post claimed that the Company’s product can help boost the immune system and was a accompanied a hashtag that referenced COVID-19. The second post depicted an image which suggested that normal product usage would offer adequate protection against the coronavirus. The final post asserted that the Company’s product kills viruses, bacteria and fungus. The post additionally stated that the product was a strong antibiotic that is safe for humans and animals.
 
After being notified of the posts in question by DSSRC, the Company informed DSSRC that they began an immediate investigation and diligently investigated the source of these claims. The Company was able to trace the inappropriate product claims back to its independent distributors and the individuals were immediately notified of their direct violation of the company policies and procedures and instructed to immediately remove all unauthorized social media posts. At this point, all of the referenced posts were removed. 

Additionally, the Company instructed all of its managers to remind their distributors that unsupported claims are prohibited by Company policies. Further, the Company set up an internal procedure to monitor all social media postings more closely to prevent any such incidents from occurring in the future. 
 
As a result of the prompt actions taken by the Company, DSSRC administratively closed the inquiry. pursuant to section 2(II)(6) of the DSSRC Procedures. 

(closed on 10/14/2020)

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary