NAD Expands Guidance on Customer-Satisfaction Claim Support, Recommends Verizon Discontinue ‘Rated #1’ Claims Challenged by Comcast; Verizon to Appeal
New York, NY – Oct. 14, 2015 – The National Advertising Division has provided additional guidance on the types of advertising claims that can be supported by customer-satisfaction surveys in a case where claims made by Verizon Communications, Inc., for FiOS internet and television service were challenged by Comcast Cable Communications. Verizon has said it will appeal NAD’s adverse findings to the National Advertising Review Board.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry system of self-regulation and administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
Following its review of the evidence in the record, including the results of a survey commissioned by the challenger, NAD recommended that the advertiser discontinue the following claims:
- “In customer satisfaction studies, Verizon is Rated #1 in internet speed and reliability”
- “Rated #1 in HD Picture Quality based on customer satisfaction studies”
NAD also recommended that the advertiser craft future claims based on customer-satisfaction surveys in a way that makes clear the claims are customer-satisfaction claims – for instance, “Verizon customers are more satisfied with FiOS speed, reliability and/or HD picture quality than customers of competing providers.”
NAD noted in its decision that it has previously held that customer-satisfaction surveys are relevant to demonstrate customer satisfaction with a particular service provider and can be used to support qualified claims about consumer satisfaction – but should avoid conveying the message that performance or service was measured and compared.
“The fact that we are reviewing this issue yet again tells NAD that we have not provided sufficiently clear guidance as to what claims can be supported by a customer-satisfaction study,” NAD’s decision states.
NAD noted that claims about customer satisfaction with a specific service attribute – particularly an attribute that can be objectively measured and compared – should clearly convey a message of customer satisfaction, not a message of superior service.
NAD further noted that claims about technical performance superiority differ from claims about customer satisfaction. Both are legitimate claims and both kinds of support are appropriate “as long as the advertisement makes clear to consumers what type of claim the advertiser is making.”
NAD found that a “reasonable takeaway from Verizon’s claims that it is ‘Rated #1’ for ‘speed and reliability’ or ‘HD picture quality,’ even when qualified by the language ‘in customer satisfaction surveys,’ is that Verizon “provides faster speeds or better HD picture quality.”
NAD cautioned the advertiser that when it is using a customer satisfaction study to support its claims, its claims should match the support provided – that its customers are more satisfied with a particular service attribute (speed, reliability or HD picture quality) than customers of competing providers.
Verizon, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it would appeal NAD’s findings to NARB.
Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends Revolve Group Modify Social Media Posts to Clearly Disclose Material Connection to Influencers
New York, NY – January 29, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended Revolve modify influencer posts to clearly and conspicuously disclose the material connections between Revolve and influencers in its product gifting program.
National Advertising Division Recommends Bullfrog Modify or Discontinue Certain Comparative Superiority Claims for its Bullfrog Spas
New York, NY – January 29, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Bullfrog discontinue certain claims promoting the personalization, power, energy efficiency, and durability of its Bullfrog spas as compared to “conventional” hot tubs.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Ardyss Earnings and Product Performance Claims to the FTC and Nevada Attorney General’s Office
McLean, VA – January 28, 2025 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred ArdyssLife to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Nevada Attorney General’s Office for possible enforcement action after Ardyss failed to confirm intent to comply with DSSRC recommendations to discontinue...
National Advertising Division Recommends Olly Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for its Kids Chillax Product; Olly to Appeal
New York, NY – January 27, 2025 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Olly discontinue or modify certain claims concerning its Kids Chillax dietary supplement’s ability to support calm and relaxed moods in children, as well as claims for Olly’s previous formulation of its Kids...