NAD Recommends Springfree Discontinue Certain Claims for its Trampolines

New York, NY – Sept. 15, 2016 – The National Advertising Division has recommended that Springfree Trampoline, Inc., discontinue challenged superiority claims, as well as claims that disparaged traditional trampolines.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Claims made by Springfree were challenged by Vuly Trampolines Pty. Ltd., maker of competing trampolines.

Claims at issue included:

  • “The World’s Safest Trampoline”
  • “Only Springfree eliminates 90% of all product related trampoline injuries.”
  • “Learn from an independent expert why Springfree is the safest choice.”
  • “Springfree Trampoline’s SoftEdge mat is 30 times more shock absorbent than pads found on traditional trampolines.”
  • “Traditional trampolines require safety pads to protect the jumper from falling on the steel frame, falling through or getting caught in the springs.  However, safety tests show that these pads do not absorb enough impact to sufficiently protect jumpers from contact with the springs and frame.”

Both parties to this case manufacture trampolines primarily for residential backyard use and are part of the high end of the trampoline market, offering innovative and revolutionary trampoline designs, including soft-edge trampolines.

NAD recognizes that these non-traditional trampolines, without a hard frame and steel springs, provide improved safety features and are designed to prevent or minimize injuries.  NAD noted in its decision that it appreciates Springfree’s commitment to safety innovation and recognizes that Springfree has extensive experience in the trampoline industry.

Following its review of the evidence in the record, NAD determined that the advertiser’s evidence was insufficient to support its disparaging claims about traditional trampolines and recommended that they be discontinued.

NAD further determined that the advertiser’s evidence was insufficient to support its comparative superior safety and performance claims and recommended that it discontinue claims that the Springfree trampoline is “The World’s Safest Trampoline” or “the safest choice,” that the trampoline’s design “eliminates 90% of all product related trampoline injuries,” and that its mat is “30 times more shock-absorbent than pads found on traditional trampolines.”

However, NAD recognized that the Springfree design offers real and meaningful benefits to consumers and noted that the advertiser is free to tout the safety benefits of its revolutionary trampoline design – including that the soft-edge design creates a very low risk of fatal head injury – so long as the claims are truthful, accurate and not misleading.

Springfree, in its advertiser’s statement, said that while it disagreed with NAD’s decision, nevertheless, “[a]s a strong supporter of the self-regulatory process, [it] will reflect NAD’s recommendations in its advertising.”

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary