NAD Recommends TaxSlayer Discontinue #1 Rated Claims Following Challenge by Intuit
New York, NY – June 27, 2019 – Following a challenge by Intuit Inc., the National Advertising Division recommended that TaxSlayer LLC discontinue challenged “#1 Rated” advertising claims, having found that the claims reasonably convey the unsupported message that this rating was based on a reliable and representative survey of consumers using products across the entire tax preparation software category.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is a division of the BBBNP’s self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs.
The challenged claims are found in online advertising, as well as a series of commercials and online videos. Each video depicts different scenarios in which consumers are shown spending their tax refunds and a voiceover states, “Slay your taxes. So you can enjoy your refund. Maximize your refund with TaxSlayer. #1 rated on Trustpilot.” The final art card states, “#1 Rated in the Tax Prep Software Category on Trustpilot. Start free today!” At the bottom of the art card, a disclosure states, “Based on more than 2300 verified customer reviews on Trustpilot. TaxSlayer has 1500+ 5-star reviews, and 84% of TaxSlayer customers rate TaxSlayer Great or Excellent on Trustpilot. Learn more at trustpilot.com/review/taxslayer.”
NAD noted that during the pendency of the challenge, the advertiser modified its claim to state, “Rated #1 in the tax prep software category on Trustpilot among companies with 3500+ reviews.” However, because the advertiser indicated that it intended to return to the challenged claims should its ranking on Trustpilot change in the future, NAD reviewed both the challenged claims and the modified claim.
NAD concluded that the challenged claims communicated not only that Trustpilot rated TaxSlayer #1 (a claim that was, at one point, accurate), but also the implied message that this rating was based on a reliable and representative survey of consumers using products across the entire tax preparation software category. NAD noted that although the reviews on Trustpilot represent customer satisfaction and not product comparisons, the claim “Rated #1” is inherently comparative as it ranks products in a category.
In support of its claims, TaxSlayer relied on the online consumer review evidence collected by Trustpilot. However, NAD determined that Trustpilot’s collection of user reviews does not provide reliable evidence sufficient to support the challenged “Rated #1 claim,” or demonstrate the comparative satisfaction of users of tax preparation software. NAD had a number of concerns with the data, including that other tax prep software companies were underrepresented in the population of online reviews that created the basis for Trustpilot’s score, lack of mechanisms verifying that reviewers are legitimate consumers of the companies they are reviewing, failure to establish that there were reviews from 85% of the market of tax software providers, and insufficient information in the record about how Trustpilot created its rankings based on review data for NAD to evaluate the methodology. NAD recommended that TaxSlayer discontinue the claims, “Number one rated on Trustpilot,”; “#1 Rated in the Tax Prep Software Category on Trustpilot”; “#1 rated on Trustpilot”; as well as the modified claim, “Rated #1 in the tax prep software category on Trustpilot among companies with 3,500+ reviews,” having determined that the modified claim conveyed a misleading and unsupported message.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”