BBB National Programs National Advertising Division Refers Advertising Claims Made by ConsumerTrack to Federal Trade Commission
For Immediate Release
Contact: Laura Brett, Director, National Advertising Division, 212.705.0109 / lbrett@bbbnp.org
New York, NY – Feb. 14, 2020 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) has referred advertising claims made by ConsumerTrack, Inc. for its GoFreeCredit.com product to the Federal Trade Commission for further review. The advertiser did not respond to NAD’s requests to provide substantiation for its claims.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is a division of the BBB National Programs’ self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs.
The express claims at issue were challenged by competitor One Technologies, LLC and included:
- “Free Credit Score”
- “Credit Report Check for $1” / “$1 Credit Report”
One Technologies contended that the challenged claims on the GoFreeCredit.com website were misleading because the advertiser fails to disclose, in close proximity to its offer, that a subscription is required. In the screen shots supplied by the challenger of GoFreeCredit.com’s mobile portal, users must scroll down the page, past the “View Score Now!” button and a Service Agreement, to read the “OFFER DETAILS” in small print. The disclosure states, “Your FREE TransUnion credit score & $1 Credit Report are available as part of a 7-day trial of our subscription-based credit monitoring service. You may cancel at any time during the trial period. At the end of the 7-day trial, you will be billed at a low cost of only $19.95 per month (plus tax where applicable).”
NAD noted that the issues raised by this challenge can be appropriately and effectively addressed by self-regulation. At issue is whether the “free” and “$1” credit report offers are misleading because prior to acting on the offers, consumers would not understand their material conditions, namely that a subscription is required. NAD has routinely provided guidance on when a disclosure is necessary to prevent a claim from being misleading, and evaluated the sufficiency of such disclosures. The guidance provided by NAD has served both consumers and multiple industries by protecting consumers from misleading advertising and promoting a level playing field whereby advertisers all play by the same set of rules.
NAD was disappointed that the advertiser did not participate in this self-regulatory process. In light of the advertiser’s failure to provide a substantive response to NAD’s request for substantiation for its claims or participate in any way in the self-regulatory process, NAD has referred the matter to the FTC for possible enforcement action.
###
About the National Advertising Division: National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation overseeing the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for truth and accuracy.
About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs (BBB NP) fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. BBB National Programs is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs that include the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), BBB EU Privacy Shield, BBB AUTO LINE, Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), Children’s Confection Advertising Initiative (CCAI), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Digital Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program), and the Coalition for Better Advertising Dispute Resolution Program (CBA DRM). The programs are designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”