NAD Refers Advertising for ‘PhytoZon’ to FTC for Further Review after American Dream Nutrition Declines to Participate in NAD Review

New York, NY – Oct. 21, 2015  – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by American Dream Nutrition, LLC, for the dietary supplement PhytoZon to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for further review after the company declined to participate in an NAD proceeding.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

The claims at issue were challenged by the Council for Responsible Nutrition and include:

  • With Hundreds of Research Documents and Clinical Studies, PhytoZon has shown to help with:
  • Brain/Body Balance – Mental Claritin, Focus/Recall
  • Mental Cognition and Concentration
  • Energy, Vitality, Increased Strength, Well Being
  • Pain, Inflammation, Arthritis, Osteoarthritis
  • Joint Health, Flexibility, Endurance
  • Sports Injuries, Back Pain, Neck Pain
  • Enhanced DNA Repair on a Cellular Level
  • Helps Cells Produce IGF-1, Repairing/Rebuilding Cartilage
  • Heart Health, Eye Health, So Much More…
  • “Helped Lower My Blood Sugar”
  • “Helped Manage My Breast Cancer”
  • “Helped with my Macular Degeneration”

NAD noted in its decision that the challenged claims promise consumers that the advertiser’s product “helps” a wide range of health issues, including extremely serious health conditions such as cancer, arthritis, and macular degeneration.

NAD further noted that couching the claims as establishment claims by referencing “research” and “clinical studies” can convey to consumers the message that the claimed benefits have been proven by rigorous and reliable scientific study. Given the potential impact of these claims, NAD was disappointed that the advertiser declined to participate in the self-regulatory forum’s inquiry into the truthfulness and accuracy of these claims.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that although it “appreciates NAD’s diligence in self-regulation,” it would decline to participate in the self-regulatory process.

In light of that decision, NAD has referred the matter to the FTC and FDA for further review.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary