‘Shoes for Crews’ Discontinues ‘Slip-Resistant’ Claims following NAD Inquiry; Claims Challenged by Skechers

New York, NY – Sept. 14, 2016 – Shoes for Crews, LLC, said the company has voluntarily and permanently discontinued “slip-resistant” claims challenged before the National Advertising Division (NAD) by shoe company Skechers.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Challenged claims included:

  •  “Independent Slip Resistance Test Results” Chart
  • “Independent lab tests show our unique compound provides more slip resistance than any shoe on the market.”
  • “The Most Effective Slip-Resistant Outsoles”
  • “The Sole That Changed the Industry … Shoes For Crews began producing slip-resistant footwear in 1984 and through superior technology quickly became the industry leader.”
  • “Shoes For Crews slip-resistant footwear has been tested and proven to be the best defense against slips and falls in hazardous, slippery workplaces.”
  • “The GRIPPING Blog … Tips and Kicks from the Global Slip-Resistance Leader.”
  • “… we make it easy for you to have all your employees wearing the industry’s #1 rated slip-resistant footwear.”

During the course of NAD’s inquiry, the advertiser advised in writing that, for reasons unrelated to the challenge, it voluntarily elected to permanently discontinue all of the challenged claims. In reliance on that representation, NAD did not review the claims on their merits. However, the voluntarily discontinued claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that Shoes for Crews “as a strong supporter of self-regulation – appreciates NAD’s time and attention to this matter.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary