BBB National Programs Decision Summaries
BBB National Programs provides summaries of all case decisions from the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), and Digital Advertising Accountability Program (DAAP). Subscribe to receive a weekly wrap-up of published case decisions in your inbox.
- All
-
4/05/2011 - NAD Refers Advertising from VISS Beauty to FTC for Review
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has referred advertising claims made by VISS Beauty Inc., to the Federal Trade Commission and Food and Drug Administration for further review, following the company’s refusal to participate in an NAD review. -
4/04/2011 - CARU Determines General Mills Advertising for Yoplait ‘Splitz’ Isn’t Likely to Confuse Child Consumers
The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., had determined that broadcast advertising for “Yoplait Splitz” is not likely to confuse child consumers or persuade them that the General Mills’ product is ice cream. -
4/04/2011 - CARU Determines General Mill’s Advertising for Yoplait ‘Splitz’ isn’t Likely to Confuse Child Consumers
The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., had determined that broadcast advertising for “Yoplait Splitz” is not likely to confuse child consumers or persuade them that the General Mills’ product is ice cream. -
3/31/2011 - NAD Recommends Born Free Discontinue Wide Range of Claims for ‘Born Free Bottle System’ Following Energizer Challenge
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Born Free LLC discontinue certain advertising claims, including claims that the product minimizes or reduces colic and middle-ear infections. -
3/30/2011 - CARU Recommends Topps Modify Website To Clearly Disclose Advertising, Company Does So
The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Topps Company Inc., modify the Ring Pops section of its Website to clearly disclose that games available to children on the site are advertising. -
3/30/2011 - CARU Recommends Crayola Modify Advertising To Better Disclose What Comes With Initial Purchase
The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that Crayola, the maker of the “Color Explosion Glow Board,” modify broadcast advertising directed to children to better disclose what items come with the initial purchase. -
3/29/2011 - NAD Refers Advertising for Health-Span Solutions’ ‘Bene-Via’ to FTC for further Review
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has referred advertising claims for Bene-Via, a beverage marketed to people over 50, to the Federal Trade Commission for further review, following the company’s decision not to participate in review of its advertising. -
3/29/2011 - CARU Recommends Shred Sled Modify Advertising To Depict Use Of Safety Gear; Company Agrees To Do So
The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that The Shred Sled, which markets the “Shred Sled” caster board, modify broadcast advertising to depict the use of proper safety equipment. -
3/29/2011 - NAD Refers Advertising for Health-Span Solutions’ ‘ Bene-Via’ to FTC for Further Review
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has referred advertising claims for Bene-Via, a beverage marketed to people over 50, to the Federal Trade Commission for further review, following the company’s decision not to participate in review of its advertising. -
3/25/2011 - NAD Refers Advertising for Kent Nutrition’s ‘World’s Best Cat Litter’ to FTC for Further Review
The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has referred advertising claims for “World’s Best Cat Litter,” made by Kent Nutrition Group, Inc., to the Federal Trade Commission for further review, after the company declined to participate in an NAD proceeding.